Zero Waste Logo The Zero Wate Network the University of Texas at Arlington Center for Environmental Excellence Environmental Training Institute Logo  

Join Us on:

Social Network Nav Bar

Lean and P2 Workshops

 

Lean and P2 Workshops

Denver
05/28/14 - 05/30/14

San Antonio
06/04/14 - 06/06/14

Bozeman
08/12/14 - 08/14/14

Arlington
09/23/14 - 09/25/14

New Orleans
10/22/14 - 10/24/14

Houston
11/18/14 - 11/20/14


more...

 

Environmental Management Systems Workshops

Houston
06/17/14 - 06/20/14

Rock Springs
08/05/14 - 08/08/14

Little Rock
10/14/14 - 10/17/14

 


more...

Case Study Database

           Add Story    |    Search Case Studies    |   

 

Huntsman Corporation

Year Submitted: 2003

Process: Process Vents

Industry: Chemical Manufacturing

Wastes Reduced: VOC Emissions

Equipment: Thermal Oxidizer

Location: Conroe TX

No. of employees: 148

Contact: Don Gonzales

Phone: (409) 760-6287



Description:

Huntsman expanded the production capacity at the Conroe plant by the addition of an alkanolamine manufacturing unit. To treat the process vent from this facility Huntsman selected a thermal oxidizer as the control device. The process vent stream had a flow rate of approximately 250 scfm and contained substantial concentration of bound nitrogen compounds.

P2 Application:

Using standard thermal oxidization, the emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx) from the thermal oxidizer would exceed 50 tons per year. Huntsman selected and installed a three stage, low NOx thermal oxidizer to reduce emissions to less than 12.6 tons per year. This three stage thermal oxidizer required additional instruments and analyzers to control the oxygen and temperature at proper levels for the most efficient combustion.

Environmental Benefits:

Thermal oxidation is the most efficient control technology to minimize the emissions vented to the atmosphere. The three stage system used by Huntsman reduces NOx emission by over 25 tons a year over standard thermal oxidation techniques. This process also reduces carbon monoxide levels to less than 100 ppm.

Details of Reductions

Additional Information :

One benefit and resulting cost savings realized by this project is energy conservation. If an absorber had been used to treat this gas stream, the absorber would have generated a liquid waste stream that required incineration. Since gas incineration in this particular process required less energy than liquid incineration, a considerable cost savings was realized in reduced natural gas usage.

Source: TCEQ



SHEP Shield
Safety
Health and
Environmental
Professional



ERP Shield
Environmental
Regulatory
Professional



ESP Shield
Environmental
Science
Professional



EMP Shield
Environmental
Management
Professional

Attend a workshop and
earn credits toward a
Professional Certification

 

 



The Zero Waste Network is one of eight Pollution Prevention Resource Exchange P2RxCenters , serving as a national network of regional information centers: NEWMOA (Northeast), WRRC (Southeast), GLRPPR (Great Lakes), ZeroWasteNet (Southwest), P2RIC (Plains), Peaks to Prairies (Mountain), WSPPN (Pacific Southwest), PPRC (Northwest). We are a proud member of the National Pollution Prevention Roundtable.

National P2 Roundtable Logo